Welcome to your local community website...

Council reveals spying figures

Posted by Tom Parnell on Jul 30, 08 01:51 PM in Local Authority

CCTV camerasBy Tom Lawrence

Brent Council has used controversial spying laws to monitor more than 300 residents without their knowledge, the Wembley Observer can reveal.

Local authority spooks have employed a variety of covert surveillance techniques to spy on noisy neighbours, people who let their dogs foul in parks, benefit cheats, underage drinkers and businesses that flout trading standards laws.

And in most cases, targets are totally oblivious to the fact they are being watched by undercover officers, or tracked on CCTV and mobile cameras.

The news will come as a shock to the people of Brent and MPs have slammed the actions, saying they have no regard for the privacy of ordinary people.

Sarah Teather (Liberal Democrat), MP for Brent East said: "Quite simply, the only excuse for spying on innocent people is if there is a serious risk to public safety.

"Local people will be understandably concerned to hear the full consequences of these surveillance laws."

Figures obtained under the Freedom of Information Act, confirmed that over the past six years, Brent Council departments made a staggering 313 spying requests under The Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act (RIPA).

The surveillance powers were introduced by the Labour Government in 2002, to tackle terrorism and matters of national security.

But local authorities across the county have used the legislation to catch out oblivious residents on a regular basis.

Brent Council confirmed departments including audit and investigations, trading standards, street care, environmental health, housing and social services had all used the RIPA powers.

It admitted councillors were not informed when the powers were put into practice.

A local authority spokesman said: "Councillors are not advised specifically of the use of these powers although all have received the new and previous versions of the anti-fraud framework, which states that surveillance is used for the investigation of fraud. "

The council's environmental health department said covert surveillance had been used to conduct investigations into allegations of noise nuisance, illegal livestock slaughter and the provision of unlicensed beauty treatments, as well as to combat dog fouling.

While trading standards admitting using the powers for criminal investigations into the sale of counterfeit goods, clocked cars and age restricted products such as alcohol and knives.

Phil Booth, from NO2ID, a group campaigning to stop government intrusion into privacy, said the council were abusing their position.

He said: "It is appalling that anti-terrorism powers are being deployed on unknowing members of the public just because they are suspected of a minor offence."

But Councillor Hayley Matthews (Liberal Democrats), responsible for community safety in Brent, defended the local authority's actions.

She said: "The council has only used these powers since they came in to make Brent cleaner greener and safer - something most local residents support."

We'd like to hear from you.
Send your
stories, pics and videos

Leave a comment


Type the characters you see in the picture above.

Keep up to date

Get involved

Our website aims to cover anything and everything news to local amateur sport and clubs to events. As users of the community we want you to set the agenda by telling us about the things that affect you, the groups and societies you run and the events you've been a part of. Send us your stories, pictures and news or join the forum to discuss local issues with your neighbours. If you've got something to say and want to be involved contact Tom Parnell or call 020 8956 8200.

Sponsored Links